Skip to content

[Feature]: Handle Composite Aggregation correctly #75

@antoineatstariongroup

Description

@antoineatstariongroup

What type of issue is this?

  • Bug report
  • Feature request

Prerequisites

  • I have written a descriptive issue title
  • I have verified that I am running the latest version of the SysML2.NET
  • I have searched open and closed issues to ensure it has not already been reported

Description

SysML2 defines 2 composite Aggregation that are not-derived.

The Section 7.2 describing the ownership of element can be resumed like:

If Element B is owned by Element A, the structure looks like this:

  • Element A holds a reference in its OwnedRelationship list to Relationship R.
  • Relationship R points back to Element A via its OwningRelatedElement property.
  • Relationship R holds a reference in its OwnedRelatedElement list to Element B.
  • Element B points back to Relationship R via its OwningRelationship property.

Proposed solution: Implements a specific collection to replace the List used when dealing with Composite aggregaiton to reflect this pattern

Steps to Reproduce

System Configuration

  • SysML2.NET version:
  • Environment (Operating system, version and so on):
  • .NET Framework version:
  • Additional information:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions