missing license and copyright

[kapouer]

Hi,
i suppose you just forgot to set them...

[kapouer]

Is there some code from gjs/gi ?

[piotras]

@creationix Any suggestion wrt license?

[creationix]

I always do MIT/BSD/ or ISC for most projects. I used Apache for luvit because the main contributors requested it. I'd rather avoid GPL if possible.

[kapouer]

I observed some similarities in the code with gjs/gi - if it's really the case, it's easier f the license is the
same (MIT in that case) and the copyright should be reproduced too. But maybe it is pure coincidence as
the purpose is so similar.
The bottom of README is a good place to put copyright info...

[Place1]

@creationix any update on the LICENSE?

[kapouer]

I think this module is deprecated in favor of https://github.com/node-ffi/node-ffi anyway.

[Place1]

node-ffi doesn't support gnome introspection to automatically create bindings, or does it?

[creationix]

@piotras I added a MIT license file. Let me know if this works for you. I forgot how much you had contributed. I should have added it as a PR so we could all discuss.

[creationix]

Does this link against gnode?

[clayrisser]

My comment was a mistake. It was another project that removed the license, and the author who removed the license was the original author, so it was actually ok.

I removed it to prevent confusion.