You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: codes/quantum/groups/rotors/rotor.yml
+1Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ protection: |
30
30
\end{align}
31
31
where \(\varphi\in U(1)\) and \(\ell\in\mathbb{Z}\).
32
32
For multiple rotors, error set elements are tensor products of elements of the single-rotor error set, characterized by vectors of angle and integer coefficients multiplying vectors of angular momentum \(\hat{\boldsymbol{L}}\) and angular position \(\hat{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\) operators.
33
+
These satisfy the usual Weyl-type commutation relations but do not violate the Stone-von Neumann theorem because \(\ell\) is restricted to be an integer (cf. \cite[Exam. 14.5]{doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7116-5}).
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: codes/quantum/qubits/stabilizer/qubit_stabilizer.yml
+11-3Lines changed: 11 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -53,6 +53,14 @@ description: |
53
53
54
54
\subsection{Code representations}
55
55
56
+
Qubit stabilizer states are quadratic-phase states on affine subspaces of \(\mathbb{Z}_2^n\): every stabilizer state can be written, up to global phase, as
for some affine subspace \(A\subseteq \mathbb{Z}_2^n\), linear function \(\ell\), and \(\mathbb{Z}_4\)-valued quadratic function \(q\) \cite{arxiv:quant-ph/0304125,arxiv:quant-ph/0408190,arxiv:0811.0898}. The rank-one projector \(P_\psi\) of a stabilizer state has Pauli-expansion coefficient vector whose Walsh--Hadamard transform is a Reed--Muller codeword; thus stabilizer projector data carry second-order Reed--Muller structure in the quadratic case \cite{doi:10.1109/TIT.2010.2070192}.
61
+
There are efficient ways to compute stabilizer inner products and other functions \cite{arxiv:1711.07848}.
62
+
The overlap between a stabilizer state and any \(n\)-qubit product state is at most \(2/2^d\) \cite[Thm. 2]{arxiv:2405.01332}.
63
+
56
64
Instead of being represented by a basis of codewords, stabilizer codes can be concisely defined and represented by a presentation of the generators of the stabilizer group.
57
65
Stabilizer generators can be arranged as rows of a matrix, forming a \textit{stabilizer tableau}.
58
66
A set of generators is not unique, and various stabilizer codes admit generators with certain locality properties.
@@ -86,6 +94,7 @@ description: |
86
94
\end{defterm}
87
95
88
96
The sets of \(\mathbb{F}_4\)-represented vectors for all generators yield a trace-Hermitian self-orthogonal additive quaternary code.
97
+
In other words, an additive self-orthogonal code \(C \subseteq \mathbb{F}_4^n\) of size \(2^r\) yields an \([[n,n-r]]\) qubit stabilizer code \cite[Thm. 2]{arxiv:quant-ph/9608006}\cite{arxiv:quant-ph/0005008}.
89
98
This classical code corresponds to the stabilizer group \(\mathsf{S}\) while its trace-Hermitian dual corresponds to the normalizer \(\mathsf{N(S)}\).
90
99
In the case of stabilizer states, the correspondence is between such states and trace-Hermitian self-dual quaternary codes; such codes, and therefore such states, have been classified up to equivalence for \(n \leq 12\) \cite{arxiv:quant-ph/0503236,arxiv:math/0504522}.
91
100
There is a complete set of invariants characterizing stabilizer states up to equivalence \cite{arxiv:quant-ph/0410165,arxiv:quant-ph/0404106}.
@@ -99,9 +108,6 @@ description: |
99
108
Properties of the underlying graph are related to properties of the code; for example, bipartite encoder-respecting graphs yield CSS codes, and graph degree controls bounds on code distance, stabilizer weight, and encoding-circuit depth \cite{arxiv:2411.14448}.
100
109
\end{defterm}
101
110
102
-
Qubit stabilizer states can be expressed in terms of linear and quadratic functions over \(\mathbb{Z}_2^n\) \cite{arxiv:quant-ph/0304125,arxiv:quant-ph/0408190,arxiv:0811.0898}.
103
-
There are efficient ways to compute their inner products and other functions \cite{arxiv:1711.07848}.
104
-
The overlap between a stabilizer state and any \(n\)-qubit product state is at most \(2/2^d\) \cite[Thm. 2]{arxiv:2405.01332}.
105
111
Alternative representations include the \textit{decoupling representation}, in which Pauli strings are represented as vectors over \(\mathbb{F}_2\) using three bits \cite{arxiv:2305.17505}.
106
112
107
113
@@ -312,6 +318,8 @@ relations:
312
318
detail: 'Qubit stabilizer states can be interpreted as states that are preparable using the Euclidean path integral in 3D Chern-Simons theory, defined on manifolds that are toy models of AdS/CFT wormholes \cite{arxiv:1611.01516,arxiv:2510.15067}.'
313
319
- code_id: topological_abelian
314
320
detail: 'Qubit stabilizer states can be interpreted as states that are preparable using the Euclidean path integral in 3D Chern-Simons theory, defined on manifolds that are toy models of AdS/CFT wormholes \cite{arxiv:1611.01516,arxiv:2510.15067}.'
321
+
- code_id: reed_muller
322
+
detail: 'The rank-one projector \(P_\psi\) of a stabilizer state has Pauli-expansion coefficient vector whose Walsh--Hadamard transform is a Reed--Muller codeword; thus stabilizer projector data carry second-order Reed--Muller structure in the quadratic case \cite{doi:10.1109/TIT.2010.2070192}.'
0 commit comments