Skip to content

cutechess -> pentanomial  #1

@vondele

Description

@vondele

The scripts bayes_opt and cutechess_batch make an incorrect assumption in the calculation of the pentanomial frequencies. Namely that the game pairs are consecutive in a cutechess match. That's not the case with concurrency>1. E.g.:

Finished game 1 (test vs base): 0-1 {Black wins by adjudication}
Finished game 2 (base vs test): 1/2-1/2 {Draw by 3-fold repetition}
Finished game 3 (test vs base): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 5 (test vs base): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 4 (base vs test): 1-0 {Black loses on time}
Finished game 8 (base vs test): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 9 (test vs base): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 6 (base vs test): 0-1 {White loses on time}
Finished game 10 (base vs test): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 7 (test vs base): 0-1 {White loses on time}
Finished game 11 (test vs base): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 12 (base vs test): 0-1 {Black wins by adjudication}
Finished game 13 (test vs base): 0-1 {Black wins by adjudication}
Finished game 15 (test vs base): 0-1 {Black wins by adjudication}
Finished game 16 (base vs test): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 17 (test vs base): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 14 (base vs test): 0-1 {White loses on time}
Finished game 18 (base vs test): 1/2-1/2 {Draw by 3-fold repetition}
Finished game 19 (test vs base): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}
Finished game 20 (base vs test): 1-0 {White wins by adjudication}

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions