Skip to content

Should we set links objects in the base FlowCfg instead of just SimCfg? #163

@rswarbrick

Description

@rswarbrick

This is prompted by a [comment(https://github.com//pull/146#discussion_r3030309064) from @AlexJones0 and he's right: it would probably make sense to be able to see passing/failing formal logs in the same way as we see them for simulations.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions