From 140a9df20a0b1d75e7c09c78fbdcb9947f0f011b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "google-labs-jules[bot]"
 <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 06:31:41 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] test: add test case for invalid URL scheme in sendWebhook

- Added a test case to `tests/sendWebhook.test.js` to verify that `sendWebhook` correctly throws a `SchemeError` when an invalid URL protocol (e.g., `ftp://`) is provided.
- Verified that the error includes the correct translation key for the error message.
- Refactored the test to use an idiomatic Jest `expect(...).rejects.toThrow(...)` pattern.

Co-authored-by: cmuench <211294+cmuench@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 tests/sendWebhook.test.js | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/sendWebhook.test.js b/tests/sendWebhook.test.js
index 622e22e..1383bf0 100644
--- a/tests/sendWebhook.test.js
+++ b/tests/sendWebhook.test.js
@@ -222,4 +222,14 @@ describe('sendWebhook', () => {
     expect(fetchBody.legacy).toBe('2025-08-07T10:20:30.123Z');
 
   });
+
+  test('should throw SchemeError for invalid URL schemes', async () => {
+    const webhook = { url: 'ftp://example.com' };
+
+    await expect(sendWebhook(webhook, true))
+      .rejects.toThrow(expect.objectContaining({
+        name: 'SchemeError',
+        message: expect.stringContaining('optionsErrorInvalidUrlScheme')
+      }));
+  });
 });