-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
implied_by not working with const-stability? #107605
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
C-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
@rustbot label T-compiler, C-enhancement
Opening an issue for the problem described in #99212 (comment)
Context: The only use-case of
implied_bythat’s currently on nightly was introduced in #102556, but as far as I can tell, that doesn’t actually do anything. Given that the generalimplied_byfeature has a behavior test, I would assume that the problem is that it isn’t working with (and isn’t tested with)rustc_const_unstable/rustc_const_stableinstead ofunstable/stable.cc @davidtwco