-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
Incorrect diagnostics while referencing supertrait associated const #72190
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-suggestion-diagnosticsArea: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`A-trait-systemArea: Trait systemArea: Trait systemC-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.D-invalid-suggestionDiagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.Diagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-suggestion-diagnosticsArea: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`A-trait-systemArea: Trait systemArea: Trait systemC-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.D-invalid-suggestionDiagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.Diagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
I tried this code:
I expected to see this happen: an error that would help me write the correct code.
Instead, this happened: rustc tells me to duplicate the supertrait bound:
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=a60b4876d5d432ebe824d2dbfa93830d
This happens on both stable and nightly.
(I think it should potentially suggest
<Self as SuperTrait>::Sizein this case, but that doesn't seem to work either, see #72192.)