I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this question since it affects multiple implementations, including this. I cross-posted to the uap-core project but sharing here just in case it is a bug with the specific implementation.
Background
There are certain user-agents where it is not possible to derive or infer the device family, brand or model from the user-agent alone.
In our application, we want to explicitly distinguish between user-agents we recognise but we don't know of the device family (which we want to output as an empty string), and user-agents we don't recognise (fallback to the "Other" value as defined in the specification).
We've observed a difference between the uap-ref-impl Javascript and uap-csharp C# implementations of ua-parser.
Even though the Javascript is described as the "reference" implementation, we're not sure if this is a bug or the intention of the specification since it is vague about how to handle a replacement value that is an empty string "".
The specification writes,
In case that no replacement for a match is given, the first match defines the family and the model. If a *_replacement string is specified it shall overwrite or replace the match.
One could interpret "no replacement" to mean either
undefined or null
undefined or null or empty string
Repro
The regex YAML is defined as
device_parsers:
- regex: '(radiocomandroid)'
brand_replacement: ''
device_replacement: ''
model_replacement: ''
Testing with the user-agent string of radiocomandroid
The Javascript implementation outputs
{
"family": "radiocomandroid",
"brand": null,
"model": "radiocomandroid"
}
The C# implementation outputs
{
"IsSpider": false,
"Brand": "",
"Family": "",
"Model": ""
}
Side-by-side
|
Javascript |
.NET |
| Device family |
"radiocomandroid" |
"" |
| Device brand |
null |
"" |
| Device model |
"radiocomandroid" |
"" |
Question
The JavaScript implementation uses a conditional (ternary) operator which will treat an empty string "" as false, which means it will fallback to the first match value.
https://github.com/ua-parser/uap-ref-impl/blob/f038cf5ddd7b9b52c724fe2b6c4d949d2ef8e6b8/lib/device.js#L24
The C# implementation uses a == null condition which will use an empty string "" as the final value.
https://github.com/ua-parser/uap-csharp/blob/master/UAParser/UAParser.cs#L523
Which of these implementations is the intent of the specification? Is an empty string considered "no replacement"?
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this question since it affects multiple implementations, including this. I cross-posted to the uap-core project but sharing here just in case it is a bug with the specific implementation.
Background
There are certain user-agents where it is not possible to derive or infer the device family, brand or model from the user-agent alone.
In our application, we want to explicitly distinguish between user-agents we recognise but we don't know of the device family (which we want to output as an empty string), and user-agents we don't recognise (fallback to the "Other" value as defined in the specification).
We've observed a difference between the
uap-ref-implJavascript anduap-csharpC# implementations of ua-parser.Even though the Javascript is described as the "reference" implementation, we're not sure if this is a bug or the intention of the specification since it is vague about how to handle a replacement value that is an empty string
"".The specification writes,
One could interpret "no replacement" to mean either
undefinedornullundefinedornullor empty stringRepro
The regex YAML is defined as
Testing with the user-agent string of
radiocomandroidThe Javascript implementation outputs
The C# implementation outputs
Side-by-side
"radiocomandroid"""null"""radiocomandroid"""Question
The JavaScript implementation uses a conditional (ternary) operator which will treat an empty string
""as false, which means it will fallback to the first match value.https://github.com/ua-parser/uap-ref-impl/blob/f038cf5ddd7b9b52c724fe2b6c4d949d2ef8e6b8/lib/device.js#L24
The C# implementation uses a
== nullcondition which will use an empty string""as the final value.https://github.com/ua-parser/uap-csharp/blob/master/UAParser/UAParser.cs#L523
Which of these implementations is the intent of the specification? Is an empty string considered "no replacement"?