Add request_id match logic for radas message receiver

[yma955]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15289854030

Details

• 1 of 8 (12.5%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 63.818%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
charon/pkgs/radas_signature_handler.py	1	8	12.5%

Totals
Change from base Build 15254309416:	-0.1%
Covered Lines:	2039
Relevant Lines:	3195

---

💛 - Coveralls

[ligangty]

Looks good.

[ligangty]

@yma96 Actually we still miss one part of the logic. If you check the tech design, you will see that the response file will give fields "signing_status" and "errors". That means it will possibly get errors in radas side. We should cover this part of handling. What I'm thinking here is, we should have a field in Receiver to tell if the response is successful or failed, and field to record the errors. Then in main process we can control based on these fields. WDYT?
If you think this is good, you can use a separate PR to handle this.

[yma955]

@ligangty That sounds good, I'll have another PR to handle the response, will merge this first, thanks.