Revision of Chapter 2.3 Surface Albedos in technical note for CLM6#3916
Draft
olyson wants to merge 8 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
Draft
Revision of Chapter 2.3 Surface Albedos in technical note for CLM6#3916olyson wants to merge 8 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
olyson wants to merge 8 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
Conversation
olyson
added
documentation
Contributor
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
Revision of Chapter 2.3 Surface Albedos in technical note for CLM6
Specific notes
Includes revisions to reference chapter
Contributors other than yourself, if any: NA
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #): #3849
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? That's what I'm doing.
Testing performed, if any:
Built documentation on local machine, no errors.