Conversation
2258014 to
e3e536a
Compare
051f153 to
910bd8d
Compare
carbolymer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but left few comments.
|
|
||
| -- | The relative path to SPO key pairs in directories created by cardano-testnet | ||
| defaultSPOKeys :: Int -> PoolNodeKeys | ||
| defaultSPOKeys n = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why the paths are different than those in Testnet.Start.Cardano? Can we reuse it there?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, you are right, it turns out that cardanoTestnetDefault returns the paths to most things. I hadn't realised, I think I should do another PR just refactoring those things afterwards.
...net/test/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedAbstainDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...net/test/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedAbstainDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...net/test/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedAbstainDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...est/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedNoConfidenceDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...est/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedNoConfidenceDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...est/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedNoConfidenceDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...est/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedNoConfidenceDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...est/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedNoConfidenceDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
572cc7b to
91327bf
Compare
8368f83 to
172d84e
Compare
172d84e to
e4f6e9d
Compare
fb73a5f to
00d1e04
Compare
...est/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedNoConfidenceDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...est/cardano-testnet-test/Cardano/Testnet/Test/LedgerEvents/Gov/PredefinedNoConfidenceDRep.hs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Galazyn <228866+carbolymer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Galazyn <228866+carbolymer@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@palas> is this still relevant? |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
|
cc @palas |
|
@smelc, sorry just saw your message. Yes, it is relevant, I have it parked because there is a problem with parameter update proposals, see these two commented out tests: . This one has the same problem so I cannot really work on it. Last thing I know was @lehins and @Jimbo4350 were investigating |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
|
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 60 days with no activity. |
|
@palas can you close this if it's not needed? |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
|
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 60 days with no activity. |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
Description
This PR aims to address this issue: #5600
With that aim, it adds two scenarios for automated DReps. This PR contains the second scenario:
Scenario 2
yeswith all the DReps.yeswith all the DReps.noto the no confidence proposal with all DReps.Checklist
See Runnings tests for more details
CHANGELOG.mdfor affected package.cabalfiles are updatedhlint. See.github/workflows/check-hlint.ymlto get thehlintversionstylish-haskell. See.github/workflows/stylish-haskell.ymlto get thestylish-haskellversionghc-8.10.7andghc-9.2.7