-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
Show specific diverged workflows in sandbox merge dialog #4396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
90ed012
Show specific diverged workflows in sandbox merge dialog
midigofrank 9d8daa3
Remove debug call and extract diverged workflows logic
midigofrank ee52247
Fix diverged workflows to check version history instead of HEAD compa…
midigofrank 1b59154
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:OpenFn/lightning into 4001-show-div…
midigofrank 11a10f1
tweak error text
josephjclark fcdb794
Merge branch 'main' into 4001-show-diverged-workflows
josephjclark 6c1b77a
Merge branch 'main' into 4001-show-diverged-workflows
josephjclark f8d0dbc
Ensure workflows have version history before operations (#4414)
midigofrank 1672988
Remove version_history field from workflows table
midigofrank 3fd6e49
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:OpenFn/lightning into 4001-show-div…
midigofrank f2b3ff3
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:OpenFn/lightning into 4001-show-div…
midigofrank ec3bacf
only remove version_history column if_exists
midigofrank File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will raise a
MatchErrorifensure_version_recordedreturns{:error, _}. While unlikely in practice, a DB issue or constraint violation would crash the caller. Can we consider using with or propagating the error ? I think same pattern is in lib/lightning/projects/merge_projects.ex:96 tooThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great catch, but error propagation at this point was kinda difficult. The existing pattern even with workflow creation was all matching
{:ok, var} = insert(workflow | edge | ...)so I just used the same pattern