Draft: Add basic support for Polish signals based on #127#128
Closed
besentv wants to merge 6 commits intoOpenRailwayMap:masterfrom
besentv:polish-signals-v3
Closed
Draft: Add basic support for Polish signals based on #127#128besentv wants to merge 6 commits intoOpenRailwayMap:masterfrom besentv:polish-signals-v3
besentv wants to merge 6 commits intoOpenRailwayMap:masterfrom
besentv:polish-signals-v3
Conversation
Nakaner
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2026
Uses maplibre/martin#1492 Unfortunately, SDF sprites cannot be layered right below each image, they have to be in their own layer below the icons. Symbols with outline:  Hovering on rail lines in their native color:  Railway direction including hover: 
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a little example how #127 makes adding a new system cleaner.
This could probably also be applied to #89.