Skip to content

Motion/election: required majority#5614

Open
reiterl wants to merge 33 commits intoOpenSlides:mainfrom
reiterl:5420-required-majority
Open

Motion/election: required majority#5614
reiterl wants to merge 33 commits intoOpenSlides:mainfrom
reiterl:5420-required-majority

Conversation

@reiterl
Copy link
Member

@reiterl reiterl commented Nov 19, 2025

@reiterl reiterl added this to the 4.3 milestone Nov 19, 2025
@reiterl reiterl self-assigned this Nov 19, 2025
@reiterl reiterl added feature Zeeman projectname Röntgen projectname labels Nov 19, 2025
@Elblinator
Copy link
Member

Mock-ups for a finished poll:
(notes)

  • "Required votes' Below valid votes
  • the number should be calculated from the client and then below the number from valid votes
  • the number should be a rounded up whole number
  • If you look at the poll detail there should be required majorities if a majoprity otehr than none is selected ^2

candidate list:
Image

motion poll or one candidate

Image Image

^2
Image

@Elblinator
Copy link
Member

The blue "two-third icon" should not be there!
That is a remnant from an old proposal

@reiterl reiterl marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 13:55
@reiterl reiterl assigned luisa-beerboom and MSoeb and unassigned reiterl Dec 4, 2025
@reiterl
Copy link
Member Author

reiterl commented Jan 5, 2026

At the moment, if the pollmethod No per candidate is selected and absolute or two-third majority is selected, always a red X is displayed. There are not enough yes votes for an other display.

@reiterl
Copy link
Member Author

reiterl commented Jan 5, 2026

Add some mat-hints to the required majority field to display a help for the selection. This is the possible way to add some
form of help text to this field.

@reiterl reiterl requested a review from bspekker January 5, 2026 11:51
@reiterl reiterl assigned bspekker and emanuelschuetze and unassigned reiterl Jan 5, 2026
@bspekker bspekker assigned MSoeb and unassigned bspekker Jan 16, 2026
@bspekker bspekker requested a review from MSoeb January 16, 2026 10:12
Copy link

@bspekker bspekker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I won't be able to review in the coming week, @MSoeb and @emanuelschuetze will take over here.

@MSoeb MSoeb requested review from MSoeb and removed request for MSoeb February 17, 2026 14:50
Copy link

@MSoeb MSoeb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • The calculation for the two-third majority is wrong. See the example in the image. Two-third of 9 are 6 not 7. Therefor the correct value for two-third majority should be 6.
Image
  • Adding analog results in a yes/no/abstain per list election didn't work correct. If a user enters a value for Valid Votes, the value will be erased if the users changes the required majority. --> The added value in Valid Votes should stay.

@reiterl reiterl requested a review from MSoeb February 19, 2026 08:01
@reiterl reiterl assigned MSoeb and unassigned reiterl Feb 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature Röntgen projectname Zeeman projectname

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Motions/Elections: Required majorities

6 participants