Md schema updates#2783
Conversation
|
I merged this, and only then did I remember why I didn't do this before. Validation will be an absolute mess for anybody who uses these still and who has not done a global search/replace. I have a new warning type ("bulk") that just says how many deprecated instances you have and does not list each and every one, or perhaps just a few (configurable). But I understand your need here.
Merged, and immediately reverted at 35cba44. :-( As part of merging, I consolidated the two commits - that's my usual practice, to include changes to derived products on the same commit as the source edits. Sorry for the mess. Replaying the new (orginal) commit will be easy. Ideally I might hold it for the end of Spring term??? Comments or ideas? |
|
How about we get the best of both worlds by adding the bare |
|
Aaha! I knew you would have a good idea. I hadn't realized it was the bare-md replacment for me that was the rub. Yes! Can you work it up, and later we can go full-bore? I'll make a note to myself for mid-May. |
|
Done, and ready for review. |
|
Thanks. Merged as-is. I hope that won't make the deprecations too painful. I'm going to close this, but we can always mine the commits for a new PR later this spring. |
Since the simplification of display math environments, pretext-tools has been suggesting
mdinstead ofmefor display math. But this is displaying errors since the change has not made its way to the schema.This PR fixes that. It also removes the "experimental" status of an Xref inside a displayed equation (this was just in the dev schema for
meandmen). That can easily be brought back if we don't think this should be "standard" for baremd.Second commit build the derived formats.