Conversation
- Add formatted output with .6f precision for all results - Simplify race condition explanation, remove verbose details - Improve code flow with better print statement placement - Enhance readability of parallel Numba examples - Clarify JAX vmap benefits and use cases - Remove redundant multithreading note from NumPy section - Strengthen conclusion about tool trade-offs 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Tested locally by converting the markdown to Python with |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR improves the readability and clarity of the NumPy vs Numba vs JAX comparison lecture:
.6fprecision for all numerical resultsTest plan
-infresult🤖 Generated with Claude Code