Pandora bugfix - Shower merging algorithm - Production#908
Pandora bugfix - Shower merging algorithm - Production#908aliciavr wants to merge 1 commit intoproduction/sbnd-gen2from
Conversation
…istent state of PFParticles (-1 track scores)
|
Presumably this one should be targeting a merge into the production branch, not develop? |
|
@AndyChappell Yes, they seem to be the same branch |
|
trigger build ci_ref=v10_14_02_03 LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_14_02_02 SBNSoftware/sbndaq-artdaq-core@v1_10_06 SBNSoftware/sbn*@SBN_SUITE_v10_14_02_03 |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
🚨 For more details about the warning phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
Approved |
Restore the shower merging algorithm in another place to avoid inconsistent state of PFParticles (-
1 track scores).
Description
Please provide a detailed description of the changes this pull request introduces.
Checklist
Reviewers,AssigneesDevelopementDone in
production/sbnd-gen2Relevant PR links (optional)
Does this PR require merging another PR in a different repository (such as sbnanobj/sbnobj etc.)?
Link(s) to docdb describing changes (optional)
Is there a docdb describing the issue this solves or the feature added?