Merged
Conversation
adampetro
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2025
Contributor
adampetro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
any idea why this started breaking now?
Contributor
Author
|
#478 was merged after the last release. And I see some testing of it but I'm not sure that it was fully tested. |
Contributor
Author
|
This fix I tested on releases on my fork of the repo |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
merge-multipledefaults tofalseand will put each artifact inside its own directory whereas the existing code assumes all artifacts are in theartifactsdirectorygh release uploadcommand either needs a Git checkout or needs the repository to specified