Support deserializing a message id from bytes and topic#259
Merged
BewareMyPower merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom Jun 8, 2025
Merged
Support deserializing a message id from bytes and topic#259BewareMyPower merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
BewareMyPower merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
shibd
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a catch up for Java's
MessageId#fromByteArrayWithTopic.The topic name is not a part of message id's protobuf definition, while the multi-topics consumer requires a message id with topic name set. There is no way to create a message id with topic name set from the serialized bytes.
With this patch, users should serialize message id, as well as the topic name. During the deserialization, pass the topic name as the 2nd argument of
MessageId.deserialize.