feat: add ICS1 prototype

[n2p5]

Description

DRAFT: WIP, this is an experimental ICS1 integration that we are testing out. It is not ready for-prime-time, but is here to give visiability to the work in progress for the ICS1 changes we're tracking in https://github.com/allinbits/interchain-security.

You can track those changes here: allinbits/interchain-security#2

TODO:

• update documentation to properly explain this change
• add e2e testing to demonstrate how ICS1 works with AtomOne

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• Included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• Added ! to the type prefix if API, client, or state breaking change (i.e., requires minor or major version bump)
• Targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• Provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• Followed the guidelines for building SDK modules
• Included the necessary unit and integration tests
• Added a changelog entry in .changelog (for details, see contributing guidelines)
• Included comments for documenting Go code
• Updated the relevant documentation or specification
• Reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• Confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[n2p5]

Closing this Draft PR in favor of our newer implementation here: #240