Cleaned up language in Specifications#69
Closed
Brianthered wants to merge 1 commit intoc2pa-org:mainfrom
Closed
Conversation
Broke up run on sentence to be more readable. Fixed pluralization noun verb agreement.
Brianthered
changed the title
Brianthered
changed the title
Contributor
|
@Brianthered thanks for the PR. Will take a look and see about applying them where appropriate! |
lrosenthol
requested changes
Oct 27, 2024
| <div class="quoteblock"> | ||
| <blockquote> | ||
| C2PA specifications SHOULD NOT provide value judgments about whether a given set of provenance data is 'good' or 'bad,' merely whether the assertions included within can be validated as associated with the underlying asset, correctly formed, and free from tampering. | ||
| C2PA specifications SHOULD NOT provide value judgments about whether a given set of provenance data is 'good' or 'bad'. The assertions can be: validated as associated with the underlying asset, can be correctly formed, and are free from tampering. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I prefer the current text - what is the concern here?
| </div> | ||
| <div class="paragraph"> | ||
| <p>Content Credentials also refers to the overall C2PA technology, and is therefore essentially treated as a plural noun. If a <a href="#_c2pa_manifest">C2PA Manifest</a> is a Content Credential, then multiple <a href="#_c2pa_manifest">C2PA Manifest</a> or the broader, universal concept is Content Credentials.</p> | ||
| <p>Content Credentials can also refer to the overall C2PA technology. If a <a href="#_c2pa_manifest">C2PA Manifest</a> is a Content Credential, then multiple <a href="#_c2pa_manifest">C2PA Manifests</a> or the universally aggreated concepts are Content Credentials.</p> |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Content Credentials ALWAYS refers to the technology - can implies a choice. Also, the grammar is important about the plural noun
What are your concerns with this text?
stonigrl
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Doing initial read through of the specifications in v 2.1.
Broke up run on sentence to be more readable.
Fixed pluralization noun verb agreement.