generated from camaraproject/Template_API_Repository
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
API-proposal-Network‑Authenticated-Assembly #305
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
abd-abhisek
wants to merge
1
commit into
camaraproject:main
Choose a base branch
from
abd-abhisek:patch-1
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
47 changes: 47 additions & 0 deletions
47
documentation/API proposals/API-proposal-Network‑Authenticated-Assembly.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ | ||
| # API Proposal Template | ||
| This template captures all the information that a partner should fill out when proposing a new API (or API family) to CAMARA. | ||
|
|
||
| ### API family name | ||
| Network Authenticated Assembly | ||
|
|
||
| ### API family owner | ||
| Infosys Limited | ||
| *Contributors: @abd-abhisek, @bishnu-infy* | ||
|
|
||
| ### API summary | ||
| High level description / scope of the API or API family, and two/three examples of in-scope business cases. | ||
| NAA is a lightweight CAMARA API that verifies whether a defined group of devices is physically co-present within a specific geographic zone and within a recent time window. Unlike Device Location Verification (single-device, coordinate-based) and Geofencing Subscriptions (individual monitoring), NAA performs a **batch relational co-presence check** across a device cluster and returns a group-level verdict | ||
|
|
||
| ### Technical viability | ||
| Identify the underlying network/cloud capabilities which are needed for the support of this API or API family, relating these capabilities to standards maturity. | ||
| - Relies on **operator network-level device location capabilities** (e.g., 3GPP NEF/SCEF location services, Rel-15+). | ||
| - k-of-n threshold evaluation and group verdict aggregation are performed server-side by the NAA Group Evaluator component. | ||
| - Subscription/event model aligns with existing CAMARA CloudEvent patterns (same lifecycle as Geofencing Subscriptions). | ||
| - Attestation token provides a tamper-evident, privacy-preserving proof of co-presence for downstream workflow consumption. | ||
| - **Scope clarification:** cluster members are restricted to operator-addressable (SIM/eSIM/line-based) devices to ensure interoperability; non-SIM beacons/tags are out of scope. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Commercial viability | ||
| - No proprietary components required beyond standard network APIs already consumed by CAMARA Device Location | ||
| - Open-source reference: CAMARA DeviceLocation API implementation available in the CAMARA GitHub organization | ||
|
|
||
| ### YAML code available? | ||
| NO | ||
| Sequence diagram is available in deck | ||
|
|
||
| ### Validated in lab/productive environments? | ||
| NO. | ||
| NO — Currently in design/proposal phase. Lab validation can be planned as a next step after CAMARA backlog acceptance | ||
|
|
||
| ### Validated with real customers? | ||
| NO. | ||
| NO — Use cases have been validated conceptually | ||
|
|
||
| ### Validated with operators? | ||
| YES | ||
| IN PROGRESS — Validation is currently underway | ||
|
|
||
| ### Supporters in API Backlog Working Group | ||
| List of supporters. | ||
| - Infosys Limited (@abd-abhisek, @bishnu-infy, @hemantagogoi-infy, @vijaymurthyn) | ||
| - BT (Pavan Kumar) | ||
| - Telstra (Shyam) | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add this diagram to the actual PR?