Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities#92

Open
cdobru wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
snyk-fix-977b8df0c6242ce9b7b6f0cd6464d887
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities#92
cdobru wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
snyk-fix-977b8df0c6242ce9b7b6f0cd6464d887

Conversation

@cdobru
Copy link
Owner

@cdobru cdobru commented Feb 12, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-QS-15268416
  590  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

@cdobru
Copy link
Owner Author

cdobru commented Feb 12, 2026

Merge Risk: High

This upgrade includes a significant breaking change in body-parser and a potentially breaking behavioral change in express.

body-parser: 1.9.0 → 1.20.4 (High Risk)

This is a major upgrade that requires code modifications. The generic bodyParser() middleware, which was common in version 1.9.0, has been removed in favor of individual, type-specific middleware.

Action Required:

  • Replace app.use(bodyParser()) with specific parsers for the content types your application handles.

Example Migration:

// Before:  
const bodyParser = require('body-parser');  
app.use(bodyParser());  
  
// After:  
const bodyParser = require('body-parser');  
app.use(bodyParser.json());  
app.use(bodyParser.urlencoded({ extended: true }));  

express: 4.12.4 → 4.22.0 (Medium Risk)

While this upgrade is within the same major version, it introduces a behavioral change that could impact applications processing complex form data.

  • URL-Encoded Parser Change: Starting with version 4.20.0, the default depth for parsing nested objects in URL-encoded data has been changed from Infinity to 32. Applications that rely on parsing deeply nested objects may encounter issues.
  • Node.js Support: Newer versions of Express 4.x have officially added support for more recent Node.js versions (10, 12, 14) and may have dropped support for older, end-of-life Node versions.

Recommendation:

  • For body-parser, you must update your code to use the new type-specific middleware (.json(), .urlencoded(), etc.) as shown above.
  • For express, verify if your application processes deeply nested URL-encoded data. If so, you may need to explicitly configure the depth option in the urlencoded middleware.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@cdobru
Copy link
Owner Author

cdobru commented Feb 12, 2026

Snyk checks have failed. 13 issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (13)
Open Source Security 0 5 8 0 13 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@cdobru
Copy link
Owner Author

cdobru commented Feb 12, 2026

Snyk checks have failed. 13 issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (13)
Open Source Security 0 5 8 0 13 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants