Skip to content

[exec.snd.expos] Reorder specification immediately after declaration#8322

Merged
tkoeppe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
cd26-353
Mar 27, 2026
Merged

[exec.snd.expos] Reorder specification immediately after declaration#8322
tkoeppe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
cd26-353

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes NB US 213-353 (C++26 CD).

Fixes cplusplus/nbballot#928

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot label Oct 5, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the C++26 milestone Oct 6, 2025
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Oct 31, 2025

This is just moving paragraphs around in the same subclause, right? What about the suggestion from the comment issue to introduce more subclauses? Should we do both, or aim straight for that bigger change (maybe to be worked out next week)?

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Oct 31, 2025
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Well, we can certainly try to add more subclauses, too.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Oct 31, 2025

Mostly for the reasons I mentioned in the other issue: it can get rather confusing to have itemdecls/itemdescrs mixed with regular paragraphs, and it's usually cleaner if those appear in subclauses of their own.

But if there isn't an obvious and clear subdivision, we can also defer that or discuss later.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 27, 2026

Ahh, I forgot you already made this pull request. Robert has confirmed that it's best to just split up the code block and not bother with introducing subdivisions, so we can do that.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 8cef46b into main Mar 27, 2026
4 checks passed
@tkoeppe tkoeppe removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Mar 27, 2026
@tkoeppe tkoeppe deleted the cd26-353 branch March 27, 2026 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants