-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Implement a LMDB stream state store #24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
incrypto32
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
krishna/lmdb-stream-state-store
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+749
−7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aac3a46 to
ac94124
Compare
ac94124 to
cffbdff
Compare
The _is_duplicate_batch check was incorrectly skipping batches based only on comparing ranges to the previous batch. This is wrong because: 1. Proper duplicate detection is handled by state_store.is_processed() in load_stream_continuous, which checks against ALL processed batches 2. The range-only comparison does not check hashes, so batches with same ranges but different data (after reorg) would be incorrectly skipped 3. After crash/restart, prev_ranges_by_network is empty anyway
cffbdff to
65a73f5
Compare
fordN
reviewed
Feb 3, 2026
fordN
reviewed
Feb 3, 2026
- Move class attribute after docstring for proper documentation tooling - Simplify metadata to only store end_block and end_hash (remove unused start_parent_hash) - Return False for empty batch_ids in is_processed (align with InMemoryStreamStateStore) - Remove prev_hash from resume watermark BlockRange (was semantically incorrect) - Add comment explaining resume watermark start=end=end_block pattern
87035d3 to
8636709
Compare
fordN
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2026
Contributor
fordN
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good! LGTM 👍
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.