Add labid as tool_assembly

[LauLauThom]

Also added the logo of the affiliation to the EMBL Heidelberg, and mentioned LabID in various places where it fits.

I could not build locally for some reason using Docker, I am getting the error

  Liquid Exception: No repo name found. Specify using PAGES_REPO_NWO environment variables, 'repository' in your configuration, or set up an 'origin' git remote pointing to your github.com repository. in /tmp/jekyll-remote-theme-20260303-343-upcia5/_layouts/page.html
             ERROR: YOUR SITE COULD NOT BE BUILT:

this is the repo's config

>git remote -v
origin  https://github.com/LauLauThom/rdmkit.git (fetch)
origin  https://github.com/LauLauThom/rdmkit.git (push)
upstream        https://github.com/elixir-europe/rdmkit.git (fetch)
upstream        https://github.com/elixir-europe/rdmkit.git (push)

[bianchini88]

Thank you for the contribution. This page is a good starting point, but the format of this page does not follow the typical one for Tools assemblies. See e.g. the Google document here.

Overall, I would appreciate a deeper description of the assembly: numerous integrations are mentioned, but without providing much detail. It would be advisable to describe the user experience a bit more. It is also debatable whether this page really needs two figures when one of them (the logo) is also part of the other (the assembly).

[LauLauThom]

Hi, thanks for the feedback, I added section to match the recommended format and addeda bit more detail about the features.
I also linked an overview video, I hope that renders correctly.
Thanks !

[bianchini88]

The video is not picked up (the action expects it to be stored on a repo, and not an external link). I think we will have to discuss internally, as it is unclear how to handle this type of content. We have a meeting on Friday, when this can be addressed.

Question: The video is about something called STOCKS, which does not seem to be mentioned on this page. Could it be that labid and STOCKS are the very same thing? Anyway, some clarifications would be required.

[bianchini88]

Moving this PR to draft until we decide how to handle the video (likely on Friday).

[LauLauThom]

Could it be that labid and STOCKS are the very same thing?

oh yes indeed ! the project was renamed some years back to avoid confusion, but the interface hasnt changed much so we didnt re-record the videos. I added a small sentence. Talk to you next week most likely for the video then ;)
Thanks !

[bianchini88]

Thank you, @LauLauThom, I will keep you posted.

[bedroesb]

@LauLauThom Thanks a lot for the changes. We have brought this PR up in our latest editorial meeting and have concluded that this PR is close to being merged. @bianchini88 will give this a final check. Thank you for hanging in there!

[bianchini88]

@LauLauThom, I fixed a couple of additional minor issues in the last few commits. The page is now up to standard and can be published. There is one final issue related to the logo. As you can see in the screenshot below, this will be the only entry on "Tool Assembly" with a logo. I would consider this unfair towards the other resources listed. We could either bring back the page without the logo and publish the content now, or update all the logos as part of this PR. I think the former solution would be cleaner (and more immediate), and then we can create logos for all the "assemblies" independently in the near future. Any opinions? Tagging also @bedroesb

[LauLauThom]

@bianchini88 Thanks for the thorough review ! Sure I don't mind having the logo removed :)