Open
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation update to Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/HyperIndex/Hosted_Service/hosted-service-features.md (1)
180-180: Minor wording clarity improvement.The description "Time the indexer source syncing has been idle" could be slightly clearer.
✨ Suggested improvement
-| `envio_indexing_idle_seconds` | counter | Time the indexer source syncing has been idle. A high value may indicate a bottleneck. Labeled by `chainId`. | +| `envio_indexing_idle_seconds` | counter | Time the indexer has been idle during source syncing. A high value may indicate a bottleneck. Labeled by `chainId`. |🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/HyperIndex/Hosted_Service/hosted-service-features.md` at line 180, Update the description for the metric `envio_indexing_idle_seconds` to be clearer: replace "Time the indexer source syncing has been idle" with a more explicit phrase such as "Duration the indexer source has been idle (in seconds) while waiting for new data or events" and keep the note about high values indicating a potential bottleneck and the `chainId` label. Locate the table row containing `envio_indexing_idle_seconds` and update only its description text accordingly.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/HyperIndex/Hosted_Service/hosted-service-features.md`:
- Around line 116-118: The fenced code block containing
"<your-endpoint-url>/hyperindex/metrics" in hosted-service-features.md lacks a
language identifier; update the opening fence to include a language (e.g.,
change ``` to ```plaintext) so the block reads as a labeled fenced code block
(keep the existing closing ``` unchanged) to satisfy markdownlint MD040.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/HyperIndex/Hosted_Service/hosted-service-features.md`:
- Line 180: Update the description for the metric `envio_indexing_idle_seconds`
to be clearer: replace "Time the indexer source syncing has been idle" with a
more explicit phrase such as "Duration the indexer source has been idle (in
seconds) while waiting for new data or events" and keep the note about high
values indicating a potential bottleneck and the `chainId` label. Locate the
table row containing `envio_indexing_idle_seconds` and update only its
description text accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 5ea4c633-edd8-4f49-bcc6-74e6d7ad61ba
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/HyperIndex/Hosted_Service/hosted-service-features.md
Comment on lines
+116
to
+118
| ``` | ||
| <your-endpoint-url>/hyperindex/metrics | ||
| ``` |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add language identifier to fenced code block.
The code block should specify a language identifier for proper syntax highlighting and markdown compliance.
📝 Proposed fix
**Endpoint:**
-```
+```plaintext
<your-endpoint-url>/hyperindex/metrics
</details>
As per coding guidelines, fenced code blocks should have a language specified (markdownlint MD040).
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
```suggestion
**Endpoint:**
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.0)
[warning] 116-116: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/HyperIndex/Hosted_Service/hosted-service-features.md` around lines 116 -
118, The fenced code block containing "<your-endpoint-url>/hyperindex/metrics"
in hosted-service-features.md lacks a language identifier; update the opening
fence to include a language (e.g., change ``` to ```plaintext) so the block
reads as a labeled fenced code block (keep the existing closing ``` unchanged)
to satisfy markdownlint MD040.
DZakh
reviewed
Apr 2, 2026
Member
DZakh
left a comment
DZakh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, good to have it documented. I think it will stay like this; don't plan more changes here. Just left a few comments.
| | `envio_progress_events` | gauge | Number of events processed and reflected in the database. Labeled by `chainId`. | | ||
| | `envio_progress_ready` | gauge | Whether the chain is fully synced to the head (`1` = synced). Labeled by `chainId`. | | ||
| | `envio_progress_latency` | gauge | Latency in milliseconds between event creation and storage write. Labeled by `chainId`. | | ||
| | `hyperindex_synced_to_head` | gauge | Whether all chains are fully synced to head (`1` = synced). | |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| | `hyperindex_synced_to_head` | gauge | Whether all chains are fully synced to head (`1` = synced). | |
| | `envio_progress_block` | gauge | Latest block number processed and stored in the database. Labeled by `chainId`. | | ||
| | `envio_progress_events` | gauge | Number of events processed and reflected in the database. Labeled by `chainId`. | | ||
| | `envio_progress_ready` | gauge | Whether the chain is fully synced to the head (`1` = synced). Labeled by `chainId`. | | ||
| | `envio_progress_latency` | gauge | Latency in milliseconds between event creation and storage write. Labeled by `chainId`. | |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| | `envio_progress_latency` | gauge | Latency in milliseconds between event creation and storage write. Labeled by `chainId`. | |
I wouldn't rely on this one
|
|
||
| ### Example: Key Metrics to Watch | ||
|
|
||
| - **`envio_progress_ready`** and **`hyperindex_synced_to_head`** — confirm your indexer is caught up to the chain head |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's not mention hyperindex_synced_to_head
| - **`envio_progress_ready`** and **`hyperindex_synced_to_head`** — confirm your indexer is caught up to the chain head | ||
| - **`envio_progress_block`** — track indexing progress over time | ||
| - **`envio_processing_handler_seconds`** — identify slow event handlers by contract and event | ||
| - **`envio_indexing_idle_seconds`** — a high value may indicate the data source sync is a bottleneck |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should be Querying seconds - idle means that the data source is not queried.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit