Conversation
|
The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow CI / buf-check (pull_request).
|
Summary of ChangesHello @julienrbrt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new command-line utility designed to clean up obsolete data from the application's database. The data, previously duplicated by the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Claude finished @julienrbrt's task in 1m 57s —— View job Code Review CompleteI've performed a comprehensive review of the new 1. Code Quality & Architecture✅ Positive Aspects
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a cleanup-goheader command to remove legacy data from the store. The implementation is straightforward, but I've found a critical issue that will prevent compilation due to an undefined variable. I've also pointed out a potential memory issue when deleting a large number of keys and suggested an improvement for robustness. Once these are addressed, the command should work as intended.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Open the database | ||
| rawDB, err := store.NewDefaultKVStore(nodeConfig.RootDir, nodeConfig.DBPath, evmDbName) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variable evmDbName is not defined in this file or package, which will cause a compilation error. It should be defined, likely as a constant, representing the name of the EVM database.
| func deletePrefix(ctx context.Context, db ds.Batching, prefix string, dryRun bool) (int, error) { | ||
| results, err := db.Query(ctx, dsq.Query{ | ||
| Prefix: prefix, | ||
| KeysOnly: true, | ||
| }) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to query keys with prefix %s: %w", prefix, err) | ||
| } | ||
| defer results.Close() | ||
|
|
||
| count := 0 | ||
| batch, err := db.Batch(ctx) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to create batch: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for result := range results.Next() { | ||
| if result.Error != nil { | ||
| return count, fmt.Errorf("error iterating results: %w", result.Error) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if !dryRun { | ||
| if err := batch.Delete(ctx, ds.NewKey(result.Key)); err != nil { | ||
| return count, fmt.Errorf("failed to delete key %s: %w", result.Key, err) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| count++ | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if !dryRun && count > 0 { | ||
| if err := batch.Commit(ctx); err != nil { | ||
| return count, fmt.Errorf("failed to commit batch delete: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return count, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This function loads all delete operations for a given prefix into a single batch. If there are a very large number of keys to delete, this could lead to high memory consumption. Consider processing the deletions in smaller batches (e.g., committing every 1000 keys) to limit memory usage and make the operation more robust against large datasets.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3040 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 61.66% 61.61% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 111 111
Lines 11120 11120
==========================================
- Hits 6857 6852 -5
- Misses 3525 3530 +5
Partials 738 738
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
1 participant
Overview
evm cleanup-goheader