libpkg: gracefully handle if target is mountpoint#2590
Closed
dch wants to merge 1 commit intofreebsd:mainfrom
Closed
libpkg: gracefully handle if target is mountpoint#2590dch wants to merge 1 commit intofreebsd:mainfrom
dch wants to merge 1 commit intofreebsd:mainfrom
Conversation
bapt
reviewed
Jan 13, 2026
- add a function to check if files are identical - handle EBUSY such as /etc/hosts is nullfs mounted from parent into jail - just remove the temp file if its actually identical - leave the temp file if not, as a pkgnew file - exit the loop instead of continuing to try to remove it repeatedly
70845bb to
63f58c6
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Generalised now, handling more error cases, and debug info. new output:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pkg: Cannot remove %s: file is busy (mount point?), skippingThis at least fixes my issue, but it's not clear to me if skipping the loop iteration is always the appropriate behaviour.
Fixes #2589