-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Bazel: fix Rust deps patching for semver build metadata #21287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2,15 +2,31 @@ | |
| import re | ||
| import pathlib | ||
|
|
||
| label_re = re.compile(r'"@(vendor.*)//:(.+)-([\d.]+)"') | ||
| # Problem number 1: | ||
| # https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust/issues/3255 | ||
| # `crates_vendor` generates broken labels in `defs.bzl`: instead of | ||
| # "anyhow": Label("@vendor__anyhow-1.0.44//:anyhow") | ||
| # it produces | ||
| # "anyhow": Label("@vendor//:anyhow-1.0.44") | ||
| # which results in: ERROR: no such package '@@[unknown repo 'vendor' requested from @@]//' | ||
| # | ||
| # Problem number 2: | ||
| # Semver versions can contain `+` for build metadata (e.g., `0.9.11+spec-1.1.0`). | ||
| # Bazel repo names use `-` instead of `+`, so `vendor_ts__toml-0.9.11+spec-1.1.0` | ||
| # becomes `vendor_ts__toml-0.9.11-spec-1.1.0`. The generated labels reference the | ||
| # `+` version which doesn't exist, causing: | ||
| # ERROR: no such package '@@[unknown repo 'vendor_ts__toml-0.9.11+spec-1.1.0' | ||
| # requested from @@ (did you mean 'vendor_ts__toml-0.9.11-spec-1.1.0'?)]// | ||
|
|
||
| label_re = re.compile(r'"@(vendor.*)//:([^+]+)-([\d.]+(?:\+.*)?)"') | ||
|
|
||
| file = pathlib.Path(sys.argv[1]) | ||
| temp = file.with_suffix(f'{file.suffix}.tmp') | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| with open(file) as input, open(temp, "w") as output: | ||
| for line in input: | ||
| line = label_re.sub(lambda m: f'"@{m[1]}__{m[2]}-{m[3]}//:{m[2].replace("-", "_")}"', line) | ||
| line = label_re.sub(lambda m: f'"@{m[1]}__{m[2]}-{m[3].replace("+", "-")}//:{m[2].replace("-", "_")}"', line) | ||
|
Comment on lines
+21
to
+29
|
||
| output.write(line) | ||
|
|
||
| temp.rename(file) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The regex pattern
([^+]+)will incorrectly capture package names for versions with+metadata. For input"@vendor//:toml-0.9.11+spec-1.1.0", the pattern will match with group 2 =toml-0.9instead of the correct package nametoml. This happens because[^+]+greedily matches up to the+, then backtracks to find a-that's followed by[\d.]+, resulting in capturing part of the version number as part of the package name. The correct pattern should be(.+)instead of([^+]+), as.+with the anchoring pattern at the end will correctly match just the package name.