Add conditional question to ground app e2e test survey

[hassan-nsubuga]

Fixes #3481

The test survey doesn't have conditional questions/tasks. Add a conditional question to the test survey to aid tests in ground-android in order to prevent regressions

• Edit survey to add a conditional question

@... PTAL?

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @hassan-nsubuga, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the accounts.json file by adding several new user entries, likely to expand the available test data for the application. However, the changes in the patch do not reflect the stated purpose in the PR title and description, which is to add a conditional question to an e2e test survey for the Ground Android app.

Highlights

• Test Account Data: Multiple user accounts were added to data/test-android/auth_export/accounts.json, expanding the available test data.
• Discrepancy with PR Description: The provided patch only shows changes to test account data, which does not align with the PR title and description's stated goal of adding a conditional question to an e2e test survey.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• data/test-android/auth_export/accounts.json
  • Added multiple user entries to the JSON array.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the test user accounts in data/test-android/auth_export/accounts.json. The main feedback is to improve the readability of this JSON file by formatting it, which will make it easier to review and maintain in the future. While the PR description mentions adding a conditional question to a survey, this change is not reflected in the provided diff.

[gemini-code-assist]

This single-line JSON is difficult to read and review. For better maintainability, please consider formatting it to be multi-line with standard indentation. This would make future changes much easier to manage and diff. While other similar files in the repository are also single-line, adopting a formatted style would be a good improvement for the project's codebase.

{
  "kind": "identitytoolkit#DownloadAccountResponse",
  "users": [
    {
      "localId": "7NN7t00BdE5wpZJoxOtGjfG6G4BZ",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771319867922",
      "createdAt": "1771319867922",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:17:48.090Z"
    },
    {
      "localId": "FE1lWJepY2gbch5gFcKMZlSF2mn2",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771321618015",
      "createdAt": "1771321618015",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:46:58.040Z"
    },
    {
      "localId": "KPZqKppnh95T4Zwsf6WZgYBai4X9",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771320827348",
      "createdAt": "1771320827348",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:33:47.374Z"
    },
    {
      "localId": "U4b72L3Ft7tczQOzz54r9dTBDdTf",
      "createdAt": "1770712429705",
      "lastLoginAt": "1770712429705",
      "validSince": "1771311089",
      "emailVerified": false,
      "disabled": false
    },
    {
      "localId": "bDq60drNuKBgHZG14dKjTEXczIwF",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771321312529",
      "createdAt": "1771321312529",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:41:52.679Z"
    },
    {
      "localId": "dfjY590WvRGzhjMJi5pUcM7uOWeT",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771320140120",
      "createdAt": "1771320140120",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:22:20.137Z"
    },
    {
      "localId": "nJRZCo52PDx3LQhh9T9WLN5WW9Wp",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771321747162",
      "createdAt": "1771321747162",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:49:07.171Z"
    },
    {
      "localId": "tlTeaeb1oCNICQGUSCkTLncyJKSa",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771320270559",
      "createdAt": "1771320270559",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:24:30.580Z"
    },
    {
      "localId": "vmsuCdnG9zQ6Hvz9eyrUXdCz4od8",
      "lastLoginAt": "1771321092896",
      "createdAt": "1771321092896",
      "lastRefreshAt": "2026-02-17T09:38:12.914Z"
    }
  ]
}

[andreia-ferreira]

tested this new data with the updated test from google/ground-android#3579 and looks nice! 👍 good to merge this when that PR is also ready to merge

[hassan-nsubuga]

[like] Nsubuga, Hassan (CSI) reacted to your message:

…

________________________________ From: Andreia Ferreira ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 2:30:53 PM To: google/ground-platform ***@***.***> Cc: Nsubuga, Hassan (CSI) ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [google/ground-platform] Add conditional question to ground app e2e test survey (PR #2440) @andreia-ferreira approved this pull request. tested this new data with the updated test from google/ground-android#3579<google/ground-android#3579> and looks good! 👍 let's merge this when that PR is also ready to merge — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#2440 (review)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BNJR3J273GAWDDCBTXH72Y34NWWZ3AVCNFSM6AAAAACV7IXTCOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZTQNJUGYZTIMZWGY>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>