Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @sai-sunder-s, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the asynchronous authentication transport by integrating mutual TLS (mTLS) capabilities. It provides the foundational components for securely handling client certificates and keys, enabling Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces mTLS support for asyncio transports, which is a valuable addition. The implementation correctly uses a thread pool for blocking I/O operations related to certificate handling. The changes are well-structured across new modules, session modifications, and accompanying tests and samples. My review focuses on a potential high-severity issue where mTLS may not be properly configured for non-aiohttp transports, and a few minor code cleanup opportunities regarding unused imports. Overall, this is a solid implementation.
| if isinstance(self._auth_request, AiohttpRequest): | ||
| connector = aiohttp.TCPConnector(ssl=ssl_context) | ||
| new_session = aiohttp.ClientSession(connector=connector) | ||
| await self._auth_request.close() | ||
| self._auth_request = AiohttpRequest(session=new_session) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's a potential issue here. If self._is_mtls is true but self._auth_request is not an instance of AiohttpRequest, the transport will not be reconfigured for mTLS. However, self.is_mtls will still report True. This could be misleading and is a potential security risk if the user believes mTLS is enabled when it is not.
Consider raising an exception for unsupported transport types to make the behavior explicit.
if isinstance(self._auth_request, AiohttpRequest):
connector = aiohttp.TCPConnector(ssl=ssl_context)
new_session = aiohttp.ClientSession(connector=connector)
await self._auth_request.close()
self._auth_request = AiohttpRequest(session=new_session)
else:
raise exceptions.TransportError("mTLS is only supported for aiohttp transport.")| import asyncio | ||
| import contextlib | ||
| import logging |
| import unittest | ||
| from unittest import mock | ||
| import asyncio | ||
| import json |
|
|
||
| from google.auth.aio.transport import mtls | ||
| from google.auth import exceptions | ||
| from google.auth import environment_vars |
No description provided.