chore: prevent start and stop to run in parallel#4335
Conversation
Synchronize the start() and stop() methods of the session maintainer to prevent them from running at the same time. That could cause a data race on the scheduled future that the start() method sets, and the stop() method reads.
Summary of ChangesHello @olavloite, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the thread-safety of the session management logic by synchronizing the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a potential data race by synchronizing the start() and stop() methods of the MultiplexedSessionMaintainer. This change ensures thread safety when these methods are called concurrently. I've added a suggestion to further improve the start() method by making it idempotent, which will prevent a potential resource leak where multiple maintenance tasks could be scheduled without canceling the old ones.
Synchronize the start() and stop() methods of the session maintainer to prevent them from running at the same time. That could cause a data race on the scheduled future that the start() method sets, and the stop() method reads.