chore: replace old python teams with cloud-sdk-python-team#561
chore: replace old python teams with cloud-sdk-python-team#561suztomo wants to merge 1 commit intogoogleapis:mainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @suztomo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the CODEOWNERS configuration to reflect a change in team structure or responsibility for Python-related code. It ensures that the correct team is automatically assigned for code ownership and review processes going forward, aligning with current organizational structures. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the .github/CODEOWNERS file, replacing the @googleapis/python-core-client-libraries team with @googleapis/cloud-sdk-python-team. This is a straightforward administrative change that aligns with the goal of updating team ownership. The change is correct and I see no issues.
Bug ID: b/479543683