Update npm package @eslint/eslintrc to v3.3.5

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
@eslint/eslintrc	3.3.3 -> 3.3.5

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

eslint/eslintrc (@​eslint/eslintrc)

v3.3.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• update dependency minimatch to ^3.1.5 (#​227) (3dc2381)

v3.3.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• update ajv to 6.14.0 to address security vulnerabilities (#​221) (9139140)
• update minimatch to 3.1.3 to address security vulnerabilities (#​224) (30339d0)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Error		Mar 10, 2026 6:11pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 6:11pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 6:11pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 6:11pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Dependency-only update to ESLint config tooling; runtime product behavior should be unaffected aside from potential lint/config parsing differences.

Overview
Updates @local/eslint to depend on @eslint/eslintrc 3.3.5 (from 3.3.3).

Regenerates yarn.lock accordingly, including @eslint/eslintrc’s transitive bumps (notably ajv to 6.14.0 and minimatch to ^3.1.5).

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7f03c21. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the shared ESLint configuration workspace to use @eslint/eslintrc v3.3.4.

Changes:

• Bumped @eslint/eslintrc from 3.3.3 → 3.3.4 in libs/@local/eslint/package.json.
• Updated yarn.lock to reflect the new dependency tree.

Technical Notes: The upstream release notes indicate security-related fixes via transitive updates (notably ajv and minimatch).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/js/eslint-eslintrc-3.x (7f03c21) with main (7e7f05d)}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.65%. Comparing base (153fb35) to head (7f03c21).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8502   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.65%   62.65%           
=======================================
  Files        1312     1312           
  Lines      133689   133689           
  Branches     5510     5510           
=======================================
  Hits        83757    83757           
  Misses      49018    49018           
  Partials      914      914           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	7.73% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.923 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.155 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.943 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.831 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.771 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.723 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.661 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.090 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.551 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.523 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.766 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$79.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$49.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$56.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$43.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$420 \mathrm{ms} \pm 799 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$96.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 439 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$87.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$313 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.528 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.374 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.455 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.658 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.636 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$89.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.400 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$96.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 471 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 553 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.659 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$88.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 523 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.953 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$96.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 507 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 436 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 446 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 643 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$596 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph