H-6313: Update `eslint-config-sheriff`, `@changesets/cli`, `@microsoft/api-extractor` by CiaranMn · Pull Request #8529 · hashintel/hash

CiaranMn · 2026-03-10T12:45:05Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

See title. Dependency housekeeping.

vercel · 2026-03-10T12:45:11Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 4:29pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 4:29pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 4:29pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 4:29pm

cursor · 2026-03-10T12:45:12Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches release automation and CI enforcement (Changesets patching and status exit behavior), which could change versioning outcomes or allow missing changesets to slip through; otherwise primarily dependency housekeeping.

Overview
Updates repo tooling dependencies, notably bumping @changesets/cli to 2.30.0 and eslint-config-sheriff to 31.3.0 (with corresponding yarn.lock churn).

Adjusts Changesets configuration/patching: enables privatePackages versioning in .changeset/config.json, replaces older Yarn patches with new ones to (1) stop @changesets/cli status from exiting non-zero when packages change without a changeset and (2) prevent assemble-release-plan from auto-major bumps for peer dependency dependents.

Tweaks local lint rules by disabling filename checks in unicorn/prevent-abbreviations, and removes an obsolete changeset file while slightly editing another changeset description.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit eb19721. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-03-10T12:46:44Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Dependency housekeeping to keep tooling up to date, with an updated Yarn patch for Changesets.

Changes:

Bump eslint-config-sheriff from 31.1.0 → 31.3.0 in the local ESLint workspace.
Adjust the Unicorn prevent-abbreviations config to stop checking filenames (checkFilenames: false).
Upgrade @changesets/cli from 2.26.0 → 2.30.0 and repoint the patch: dependency to a new patch file.
Replace the previous Changesets patch with a new patch against 2.30.0 that suppresses the hard failure when changesets are missing.
Update the lockfile to reflect the dependency bumps (including @microsoft/api-extractor as indicated by the PR title).

Technical Notes: Uses Yarn’s patch: protocol to modify the compiled Changesets CLI bundles (CJS + ESM) to better fit the repo’s CI/release workflow expectations.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

.yarn/patches/@changesets-cli-npm-2.30.0-83a4e8887c.patch

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

package.json

codecov · 2026-03-10T12:50:27Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.65%. Comparing base (153fb35) to head (eb19721).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8529   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.65%   62.65%           
=======================================
  Files        1312     1312           
  Lines      133689   133689           
  Branches     5510     5510           
=======================================
  Hits        83757    83757           
  Misses      49018    49018           
  Partials      914      914

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-03-10T12:50:55Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 24 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 56 skipped benchmarks¹

_{Comparing cm/more-dependency-updates (eb19721) with main (153fb35)}

56 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

github-actions · 2026-03-10T17:35:58Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.660 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.865 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$78.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$47.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$49.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.484 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$57.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$419 \mathrm{ms} \pm 741 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.353 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$88.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$319 \mathrm{ms} \pm 796 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.670 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.413 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.525 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.872 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$31.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$91.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$146 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$99.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 603 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$90.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$97.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 549 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 543 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 415 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.681 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 701 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$593 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.61 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

CiaranMn added 5 commits March 10, 2026 11:36

upgrade @microsoft/api-extractor

d76ef74

update eslint-config-sheriff

5fb38af

yarn dedup

5f5bd28

disable checking abbreviated filenames

db649ab

update @changesets/cli

bb230ec

CiaranMn self-assigned this Mar 10, 2026

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Mar 10, 2026

Merge branch 'main' into cm/more-dependency-updates

7fa0e94

augmentcode bot reviewed Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

.yarn/patches/@changesets-cli-npm-2.30.0-83a4e8887c.patch Show resolved Hide resolved

yarn dedup

9c66eb0

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 10, 2026 12:49 View deployment

cursor bot reviewed Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

package.json Show resolved Hide resolved

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 10, 2026 12:50 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 10, 2026 12:50 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 10, 2026 13:02 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested review from a team March 10, 2026 13:11

fix changeset patches, changeset files

632d4bc

github-actions bot added the area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) label Mar 10, 2026

CiaranMn requested a review from vilkinsons March 10, 2026 15:17

CiaranMn enabled auto-merge March 10, 2026 15:17

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 10, 2026 15:19 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 10, 2026 15:19 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 10, 2026 15:20 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 10, 2026 15:30 View deployment

fix package.json sorting

eb19721

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 10, 2026 16:18 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 10, 2026 16:19 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 10, 2026 16:19 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 10, 2026 16:29 View deployment

vilkinsons approved these changes Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

CiaranMn added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 10, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 7e7f05d Mar 10, 2026
175 of 176 checks passed

CiaranMn deleted the cm/more-dependency-updates branch March 10, 2026 17:19

Conversation

CiaranMn commented Mar 10, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Mar 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Mar 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

vercel bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading