Skip to content

Fix conversion of backing fields of overridable properties#1237

Draft
GrahamTheCoder wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix-issue-827-myclass-property-2635451807914525187
Draft

Fix conversion of backing fields of overridable properties#1237
GrahamTheCoder wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix-issue-827-myclass-property-2635451807914525187

Conversation

@GrahamTheCoder
Copy link
Member

This PR addresses issue #827, ensuring that accessing the backing field of an overridable property is correctly translated to accessing MyClass[PropertyName]. It also properly identifies these accesses using semantic analysis to trigger the generation of the MyClass[PropertyName] delegating auto-property. Added corresponding unit tests in MemberTests.cs to guarantee behavior.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2635451807914525187 started by @GrahamTheCoder

This commit fixes issue #827 where accessing the auto-generated backing
field (e.g. `_Prop`) of an overridable (virtual) property in VB.NET was
incorrectly converted to the virtual property access (`Prop`) in C#.

It now correctly maps these accesses to the explicitly generated
non-virtual backing property `MyClassProp` and ensures that the
MyClassProp property is correctly generated when such an access occurs.

A test case has been added to MemberTests.cs to verify the correct
translation of such field access.

Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant