Add documentation for ServiceAccountNodeAudienceRestriction feature#54931
Add documentation for ServiceAccountNodeAudienceRestriction feature#54931aramase wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes:mainfrom
Conversation
|
/assign enj liggitt |
✅ Pull request preview available for checkingBuilt without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
LGTM label has been added. DetailsGit tree hash: 9b2c35ac67cb2bdb156295dd976c484de69b3006 |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: enj The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Anish Ramasekar <anish.ramasekar@gmail.com>
339c948 to
dc625f5
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
We have technical LGTM. /assign @dipesh-rawat |
lmktfy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Eesh. This new verb makes authz kinda hard to teach. Especially as it is available by default, let's put in more effort into explaining authz; these audience restriction changes are making it considerably harder for learners to build a useful mental model.
|
|
||
| | Attribute | Value | | ||
| | ---------- | ----- | | ||
| | Verb | `request-serviceaccounts-token-audience` | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should update the authorization page to explain about this kind of verb. It is very very different from the common verbs, such as get and delete.
Implementation PR:
/sig auth