Skip to content

Fix encryption docs: stop steering users toward custom encryption when basic suffices#3325

Open
Connor Braa (cwlbraa) wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
cwlbraa/lsd-less-custom-encryption
Open

Fix encryption docs: stop steering users toward custom encryption when basic suffices#3325
Connor Braa (cwlbraa) wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
cwlbraa/lsd-less-custom-encryption

Conversation

@cwlbraa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cwlbraa Connor Braa (cwlbraa) commented Mar 26, 2026

  • Moves "selective field encryption" to the basic encryption row in the comparison table — LANGGRAPH_AES_JSON_KEYS already handles this use case, so listing it as a reason to use custom encryption was misleading
  • Removes the "Selective field encryption" bullet from the custom encryption use-case list
  • Adds a prominent <Warning> box at the top of the custom encryption section making it explicit that custom encryption should only be used when basic encryption doesn't meet your needs

Why

The doc was implicitly directing users toward custom encryption (more complex, requires implementing/maintaining handlers) for a use case (selective field encryption) that basic encryption already covers natively. This increases operational burden unnecessarily.

I've already jumped on one random customer call to Shepard folks in the right direction, this should prevent that from repeating.

…uffices

- Move "selective field encryption" to the basic encryption row in the
  comparison table (LANGGRAPH_AES_JSON_KEYS already covers this use case)
- Remove "Selective field encryption" bullet from custom encryption use cases
- Add a prominent Warning box at the top of the custom encryption section
  discouraging its use when basic encryption meets the user's needs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Mintlify preview ID generated: preview-cwlbra-1774553141-53c2668

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

internal langsmith For docs changes to LangSmith

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants