feat(QM): unbounded operator inequalities#993
Open
gloges wants to merge 8 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Open
feat(QM): unbounded operator inequalities#993gloges wants to merge 8 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
gloges wants to merge 8 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
t-quantum-mechanics |
Contributor
Author
|
RFC |
Comment on lines
+270
to
+272
| ring_nf | ||
| rw [Complex.I_sq] | ||
| ring |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would grind [Complex.I_sq] work here?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, that worked a charm!
| simp only [inner_conj_symm] | ||
| refine ⟨fun hT x ↦ (hT x x).symm, ?_⟩ | ||
| intro h x y | ||
| rw [inner_map_polarization, inner_map_polarization'] |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| rw [inner_map_polarization, inner_map_polarization'] | |
| refine ⟨fun hT x ↦ (hT x x).symm, fun h x y ↦ ?_⟩ |
Comment on lines
+225
to
+227
| · intro u v huv | ||
| refine (adjoint_apply_eq U₁.dense_domain v ?_).symm | ||
| exact fun x ↦ huv ▸ heq x u |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| · intro u v huv | |
| refine (adjoint_apply_eq U₁.dense_domain v ?_).symm | |
| exact fun x ↦ huv ▸ heq x u | |
| · exact fun u v huv => (adjoint_apply_eq U₁.dense_domain v (fun x ↦ huv ▸ heq x u).symm |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks, I have made the suggested changes. |
Comment on lines
+126
to
+127
| refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h ▸ closure_isClosed U⟩ | ||
| intro h |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h ▸ closure_isClosed U⟩ | |
| intro h | |
| refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h ▸ closure_isClosed U⟩ |
| lemma isSelfAdjoint_isClosed {T : UnboundedOperator H H} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) : IsClosed T := | ||
| hT ▸ adjoint_isClosed T | ||
|
|
||
| lemma isSelfAdjoint_isSymmetric {T : UnboundedOperator H H} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) : |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
isSymmetric_of_isSelfAdjoint probably a better name here
| SetLike.val_smul, inner_smul_left, Complex.conj_I, inner_smul_right] | ||
| grind [Complex.I_sq] | ||
|
|
||
| lemma inner_map_polarization' (x y : T.domain) : |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This lemma and the one above might be better suited further up the file
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
IsSymmetricfor unbounded operators and shows this is equivalent to having⟪Tx, x⟫real.le_adjoint_adjoint,adjoint_ge_adjoint_of_leandclosure_mono).isSymmetric_iff_le_adjoint).(cf. #982 for poset)