Skip to content

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate#657

Merged
hombit merged 1 commit intomainfrom
pre-commit-ci-update-config
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate#657
hombit merged 1 commit intomainfrom
pre-commit-ci-update-config

Conversation

@pre-commit-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot commented Mar 30, 2026

updates:
- [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.15.7 → v0.15.8](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.15.7...v0.15.8)
@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot requested a review from hombit as a code owner March 30, 2026 19:48
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.94%. Comparing base (5861bd1) to head (8b3e682).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #657   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.94%   82.94%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        2720     2720           
=======================================
  Hits         2256     2256           
  Misses        464      464           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hombit hombit merged commit 1847657 into main Mar 30, 2026
53 checks passed
@hombit hombit deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch March 30, 2026 20:18
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 30, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 106 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 106 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing pre-commit-ci-update-config (8b3e682) with main (5861bd1)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 106 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on main (8b3e682) during the generation of this report, so 5861bd1 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant