Skip to content

update ejs from 3.1.10 to 4.0.1#949

Open
MohamedAbdElwahabOka wants to merge 1 commit intolive-codes:developfrom
MohamedAbdElwahabOka:update-ejs-from-3.1.10-to-4.0.1
Open

update ejs from 3.1.10 to 4.0.1#949
MohamedAbdElwahabOka wants to merge 1 commit intolive-codes:developfrom
MohamedAbdElwahabOka:update-ejs-from-3.1.10-to-4.0.1

Conversation

@MohamedAbdElwahabOka
Copy link

@MohamedAbdElwahabOka MohamedAbdElwahabOka commented Feb 18, 2026

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • ✨ Feature
  • 🐛 Bug Fix
  • 📝 Documentation Update
  • 🎨 Style
  • ♻️ Code Refactor
  • 🔥 Performance Improvements
  • ✅ Test
  • 🤖 Build
  • 🔁 CI
  • 📦 Chore (Release)
  • ⏩ Revert
  • 🌐 Internationalization / Translation

Description

update ejs from 3.1.10 to 4.0.1

Related Tickets & Documents

#875

Added tests?

  • 👍 yes
  • 🙅 no, because they aren't needed
  • 🙋 no, because I need help

Added to documentations?

  • 📓 docs (./docs)
  • 📕 storybook (./storybook)
  • 📜 README.md
  • 🙅 no documentation needed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated EJS library from version 3.1.10 to version 4.0.1
  • Documentation

    • Updated EJS language documentation to reflect the new library version

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Deploy Preview for livecodes ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 03319fa
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/livecodes/deploys/699625a24c826300088175b0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-949--livecodes.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Walkthrough

The EJS library version is updated from v3.1.10 to v4.0.1 across documentation and vendor configuration files, ensuring consistent version references throughout the codebase.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
EJS Version Update
docs/docs/languages/ejs.mdx, src/livecodes/vendors.ts
Updated EJS library version from v3.1.10 to v4.0.1 in documentation references and vendor URL configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and concisely summarizes the main change: updating the EJS library from version 3.1.10 to 4.0.1, which aligns with changes in both documentation and vendor configuration files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/docs/languages/ejs.mdx`:
- Line 77: The PR is mislabeled as a documentation-only change even though the
runtime vendor URL was modified (the `ejs` version string in
docs/docs/languages/ejs.mdx mirrors the actual runtime swap of `ejsUrl` in
vendors.ts); update the PR metadata to an appropriate type (e.g., "dependency
update", "bug fix", or "enhancement") by changing the contribution checklist
selection, PR title, and label(s) to reflect that this touches runtime code
rather than only docs so reviewers and CI reflect correct scope.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments