Add missing technical terms to Vale vocabulary

[mintlify]

Summary

Adds 18 technical terms, product names, and abbreviations to the Vale spelling vocabulary that appear in the English documentation prose but were not yet in accept.txt.

New entries

• Product names: Ahrefs, Astro, Devin, Shiki, Splunk, Squoosh, SVGR
• Technical terms: autocomplete, linter/linting, regex, revalidate/revalidation, deduplicated (extended existing pattern)
• Abbreviations: PST, ROI, RTL, URIs, UTF, JWTs (extended JWT to JWTs?)

Modified entries

• deduplication → (?i)deduplic(ated?|ation) to cover "deduplicated"
• JWT → JWTs? to cover the plural form

---

Note

Low Risk
Low risk: only updates the Vale accepted-words list to reduce false-positive spelling/style lint warnings; no runtime code paths are affected.

Overview
Expands the Vale Mintlify accepted vocabulary (.vale/styles/config/vocabularies/Mintlify/accept.txt) with additional technical terms, product names, and abbreviations seen in docs.

Also broadens existing entries to cover common variants by changing deduplication to (?i)deduplic(ated?|ation) and JWT to JWTs?.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b28ebb2. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
mintlify	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Apr 10, 2026, 12:40 AM

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b28ebb2. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Regex misses "revalidates" found in documentation prose

Medium Severity

The pattern revalidat(e|ion) matches "revalidate" and "revalidation" but not "revalidates", which appears in deploy/github.mdx alt text (e.g., "the green check mark that revalidates the repository settings"). The alternation needs to include the third-person singular form — something like revalidat(es?|ion) — to avoid a false positive Vale warning for that existing word.

 

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b28ebb2. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Regex misses "linters" found in documentation prose

Medium Severity

The pattern (?i)lint(er|ing) matches "linter" and "linting" but not "linters", which appears in guides/style-and-tone.mdx (e.g., "Run Vale or other linters on every pull request"). The alternation needs to account for the plural form — something like (?i)lint(ers?|ing) — to prevent a false positive Vale warning.

 

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b28ebb2. Configure here.}