🧪 Add test for invalid URL scheme error in sendWebhook#38
🧪 Add test for invalid URL scheme error in sendWebhook#38
Conversation
- Added a test case to `tests/sendWebhook.test.js` to verify that `sendWebhook` correctly throws a `SchemeError` when an invalid URL protocol (e.g., `ftp://`) is provided. - Verified that the error includes the correct translation key for the error message. - Refactored the test to use an idiomatic Jest `expect(...).rejects.toThrow(...)` pattern. Co-authored-by: cmuench <211294+cmuench@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
This PR improves the test coverage of the
sendWebhookfunction by adding a missing test case for invalid URL scheme validation.🎯 What: The testing gap addressed is the lack of a unit test for the URL protocol validation in
sendWebhook.📊 Coverage: A new test case has been added to
tests/sendWebhook.test.jsthat verifies:sendWebhookthrows aSchemeErrorwhen a URL with an unsupported scheme (e.g.,ftp://) is used.optionsErrorInvalidUrlScheme).✨ Result: Increased confidence in the security and reliability of the webhook triggering logic by ensuring only
http:andhttps:protocols are accepted, as intended.PR created automatically by Jules for task 12291613438422998534 started by @cmuench