This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 15, 2026. It is now read-only.
descriptor validation#29
Merged
vbatts merged 1 commit intoopencontainers:masterfrom Oct 6, 2016
xiekeyang:desc-val
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: xiekeyang <keyang.xie@gmail.com>
vbatts
reviewed
Sep 22, 2016
| defer f.Close() | ||
|
|
||
| tr := tar.NewReader(f) | ||
| loop: |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is the named loop entirely needed? I'm not opposed to them, but I don't see any inner loops to distinguish from
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
loop:
for {
hdr, err := tr.Next()
switch err {
case io.EOF:
break loop
case nil:
// success, continue below
default:
return nil, err
}
if hdr.Name == filepath.Join("blobs", desc.algo(), desc.hash()) &&
!hdr.FileInfo().IsDir() {
buf, err := ioutil.ReadAll(tr)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return ioutil.NopCloser(bytes.NewReader(buf)), nil
}
} break is located in switch-case block, but it want to break the for-loop. So it should point the label( as break loop). Otherwise, the break will jump out switch-case block.
Of course, we can use if checking instead of switch-case, which not use label. But it is same effect.
If my explain has covered your question?
Contributor
Author
|
PTAL. |
Member
|
LGTM |
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Function
(d *descriptor) validate()is for descriptor variable, with which the exact cas file path is clear. So in this function, it is safely to open the target file, needn't to walk again.Other walking mechanism is working properly, to need overall refactor, so I don't touch them hastily.
This PR refers to #5 , by @wking, on reading file part. I'm not very sure if this PR is valuable to be accepted individually. Otherwise we should close it and wait for #5 , or please @wking amend this PR with his singed-off?
As to me, I hope a cas reading/writing API can be used to code.
Signed-off-by: xiekeyang keyang.xie@gmail.com
cc @wking @stevvooe