Skip to content

8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute#4265

Closed
jpbempel wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
openjdk-bots:backport-jpbempel-86c24b31-master
Closed

8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute#4265
jpbempel wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
openjdk-bots:backport-jpbempel-86c24b31-master

Conversation

@jpbempel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jpbempel jpbempel commented Feb 12, 2026


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8240908 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4265/head:pull/4265
$ git checkout pull/4265

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4265
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4265/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4265

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4265

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4265.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bridgekeeper Bot commented Feb 12, 2026

👋 Welcome back jpbempel! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Feb 12, 2026

@jpbempel This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 59 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk Bot changed the title Backport 86c24b319ed5e2f0097cfb4b1afe2eb358eb5f75 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute Feb 12, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Feb 12, 2026

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 12, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mlbridge Bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Feb 26, 2026

⚠️ @jpbempel This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk Bot removed the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Feb 26, 2026
@GoeLin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

GoeLin commented Feb 26, 2026

Hi @jpbempel
can you please do dependent pull request for the follow-up issues?
I ran your change through our testing and the new test fails.
Thanks.

@kriegaex
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@GoeLin, I am just an interested spectator here, I hope it is OK to ask some questions:

  1. Where can I see the results of your failed tests to find out what exactly went wrong? The build checks here seem to indicate no errors.
  2. Why a "dependent pull request", whatever that may mean to you? Is it not easier to just update this PR by either force-pushing an improved version or just committing fixes on top of it?

@jpbempel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jpbempel commented Mar 3, 2026

Hi @jpbempel can you please do dependent pull request for the follow-up issues? I ran your change through our testing and the new test fails. Thanks.

I ran locally tier1 and only this test is failing: java/util/Locale/PreserveTagCase.java
But it fails without my change on master.
Please provide more information on fail tests on your side

@GoeLin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

GoeLin commented Mar 11, 2026

Hi @jpbempel
The JBS issue lists as related issuee JDK-8281243 Test java/lang/instrument/RetransformWithMethodParametersTest.java is failing
You need to backport that on top of this change, a so called "dependend pull request":
check out origin/pr/4265, make a new branch backport_8281243 on top, push that branch and compare to 4265 in the PR.

@jpbempel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jpbempel commented Mar 18, 2026

@GoeLin made the dependent PR here: #4300

@GoeLin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

GoeLin commented Mar 19, 2026

Hi @jpbempel
I think you can now request approval for this and the follow-up. I will approve them.

@jpbempel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/approval 8240908 request

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Mar 19, 2026

@jpbempel
8240908: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Mar 19, 2026
@jpbempel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Mar 24, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

@jpbempel
Your change (at version ac6c0f6) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Going to push as commit ccd93e9.
Since your change was applied there have been 60 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 24, 2026
@openjdk openjdk Bot closed this Mar 24, 2026
@openjdk openjdk Bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Mar 24, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

@phohensee @jpbempel Pushed as commit ccd93e9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants