err msg: fix secret.spec.data typo#787
Conversation
Secrets don't have a `.spec.data` field; the `.data` is at the root. Signed-off-by: Frank Villaro-Dixon <frank@villaro-dixon.eu>
WalkthroughUpdated error message templates in routerCertsDomainValidationController.validateRouterCertificates to reference secret/%v.data[%v] instead of secret/%v.spec.data[%v] for several error cases. No control flow or logic changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting Knowledge Base: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Knowledge Base setting 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Hi @Frankkkkk. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Frankkkkk The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@liouk could I have your approval please? Thanks! |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
|
/remove-lifecycle stale
|
Secrets don't have a
.spec.datafield; the.datais at the root.Cheers!
Summary by CodeRabbit