[release-4.19] OCPBUGS-81736: Migrate InstallPlan components table to PatternFly Table

[rhamilto]

Summary

Cherry-pick of the InstallPlan components table migration to PatternFly v6 Table components to the release-4.19 branch.

This PR:

• Replaces HTML table markup with PatternFly Table components (PFTable, Thead, Tr, Th, Tbody, Td) in the InstallPlanPreview component
• Replaces raw co-m-pane__body div wrapper with the proper PaneBody component for consistency
• Resolves merge conflict by ensuring both PatternFly Table imports and classNames utility are included

Related Issues

• OCPBUGS-78253

Test Plan

• Verify InstallPlan preview page renders correctly
• Verify table displays components with proper styling
• Verify approve/deny actions work as expected
• Verify no console errors

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78253, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "4.22.0" instead
• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78253 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.20.0, 4.20.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Cherry-pick of the InstallPlan components table migration to PatternFly v6 Table components to the release-4.19 branch.

This PR:

• Replaces HTML table markup with PatternFly Table components (PFTable, Thead, Tr, Th, Tbody, Td) in the InstallPlanPreview component
• Replaces raw co-m-pane__body div wrapper with the proper PaneBody component for consistency
• Resolves merge conflict by ensuring both PatternFly Table imports and classNames utility are included

Related Issues

• OCPBUGS-78253

Test Plan

• Verify InstallPlan preview page renders correctly
• Verify table displays components with proper styling
• Verify approve/deny actions work as expected
• Verify no console errors

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81736, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81322 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Cherry-pick of the InstallPlan components table migration to PatternFly v6 Table components to the release-4.19 branch.

This PR:

• Replaces HTML table markup with PatternFly Table components (PFTable, Thead, Tr, Th, Tbody, Td) in the InstallPlanPreview component
• Replaces raw co-m-pane__body div wrapper with the proper PaneBody component for consistency
• Resolves merge conflict by ensuring both PatternFly Table imports and classNames utility are included

Related Issues

• OCPBUGS-78253

Test Plan

• Verify InstallPlan preview page renders correctly
• Verify table displays components with proper styling
• Verify approve/deny actions work as expected
• Verify no console errors

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[rhamilto]

/jira refresh
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81736, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81322 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)

• do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 14c1b106-997b-4092-9adb-d76570c5ed21

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sg00dwin]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhamilto, sg00dwin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/OWNERS [rhamilto]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@rhamilto: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[rhamilto]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81736, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81322 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.