Skip to content

NO-JIRA: Inherit any OpenShift global CodeRabbit setting#519

Open
jsafrane wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
jsafrane:coderabbit-inheritance
Open

NO-JIRA: Inherit any OpenShift global CodeRabbit setting#519
jsafrane wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
jsafrane:coderabbit-inheritance

Conversation

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane jsafrane commented Mar 6, 2026

This is required by TRT to get their global checks into this repository.

cc @openshift/storage

This is required by TRT to get their global checks into this repository.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

This is required by TRT to get their global checks into this repository.

cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 6, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 6, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b411dfdb-c920-482b-8be1-f861a3f6336e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 735a1ea and 608743a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file to add a new top-level configuration parameter. A comment line is added to document the purpose, followed by a new inheritance: true entry. This configuration change introduces three new lines with no deletions or modifications to existing code structures.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: enabling inheritance of OpenShift global CodeRabbit settings in the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the purpose of the inheritance configuration and identifying the team requiring this change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR only modifies .coderabbit.yaml configuration file with no test code changes or Ginkgo test titles.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed This check does not apply; the repository uses standard Go testing package with table-driven patterns, not Ginkgo framework.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from RomanBednar and dfajmon March 6, 2026 12:57
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 6, 2026
@Phaow
Copy link
Contributor

Phaow commented Mar 6, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 6, 2026
@Phaow
Copy link
Contributor

Phaow commented Mar 8, 2026

/retest-required

@dfajmon
Copy link
Contributor

dfajmon commented Mar 9, 2026

/retest

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Mar 10, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@dobsonj
Copy link
Member

dobsonj commented Mar 10, 2026

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2026

@jsafrane: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/hypershift-e2e-aks 608743a link true /test hypershift-e2e-aks

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants